How Does the Land Use Act Affect Land Rights in Nigeria?

The Land Use Act of 1978 represents a pivotal legislation that redefined land ownership and rights in Nigeria. Understanding how this Act affects land rights is essential for grasping the complex landscape of property ownership in the country.

Historical Context:

Before the enactment of the Land Use Act, land in Nigeria was largely governed by customary land tenure systems. Communities held land collectively, and rights of occupancy were subject to local customs and traditions. However, with increasing urbanization and economic development, there arose a need for a more centralized and uniform system of land control and allocation.

Key Provisions Affecting Land Rights:

The Land Use Act introduced several provisions that significantly impact land rights in Nigeria:

1. Vesting of Land Control in Governors:

The Act's most transformative provision is the vesting of control over all land in the states' governors. Section 1 states, "all lands comprising the territory of each state in the Federation are hereby vested in the governor of that state." This effectively transferred land control from communities to the state governments.

2. Consent for Land Transactions:

Section 22 of the Act stipulates that individuals cannot alienate, mortgage, or lease land without the governor's consent. This requirement affects land rights by centralizing the state's role in land transactions.

3. Rights of Occupancy:

The Act introduced the concept of Rights of Occupancy (RoO), defining the nature of rights that individuals have in land. Statutory Rights of Occupancy (SRO) and Customary Rights of Occupancy (CRO) are recognized. While SROs are granted by the governor, CROs are based on customary law.

4. Revocation of Rights:

The governor is granted the power to revoke RoOs on various grounds, including non-compliance with the Act and overriding public interest. This provision has raised concerns about the security of land rights.

5. Statutory Rights of Occupancy:

SROs are subject to specific conditions and covenants, which can affect land rights. These conditions can restrict land usage and transfer.

Challenges and Controversies:

The Land Use Act has been met with a mix of support and controversy:

• Indigenous Land Rights: Critics argue that the Act infringes on the land rights of indigenous communities by centralizing land control in the hands of state governors.

• Excessive Power: The Act's provisions have been criticized for giving state governors excessive power over land, which can lead to potential abuses.

• Insecurity of Land Rights: The requirement for governor's consent in land transactions and the power to revoke RoOs have raised concerns about the security of land rights.

Impact on Land Rights:

The Land Use Act has profoundly affected land rights in Nigeria. It transitioned land from communal ownership to state control, impacting customary land tenure systems and the rights of indigenous communities. It introduced a more centralized and regulated approach to land ownership, but it has also raised questions about the security of individual land rights.

In conclusion, the Land Use Act has had a profound and lasting impact on land rights in Nigeria. It represents a significant shift in land governance, centralizing control in the hands of state governors and introducing new mechanisms for land allocation and transaction. The Act's influence on land rights remains a subject of debate and exploration.

WRITTEN BY CHAMAN LAW FIRM TEAM

Email: chamanlawfirm@gmail.com, info@chamanlawfirm.com

TEL: 08065553671, 08024200080